The richer sex: Female workers ‘set to earn more than men in EVERY profession’ within 25 years | Mail Online

The richer sex: Female workers ‘set to earn more than men in EVERY profession’ within 25 years | Mail Online.

I have been musing on the issues in the above article recently as more and more of my professional Jamaican sistahs choose partnerships with men who earn less than they do, often without blinking twice (blame the so-called man shortage, desperation, I guess).

No… I’m being funny. I have no hang ups about being with someone whose paycheck is smaller than mine, proven that time and again in past relationships. He just can’t be lazy, unambitious or suffer from terminal female dependency syndrome. You know, the condition where a woman is not only relied on to stock the house with Skittles, soda, spare batteries for the remote, but also to send minutes/credit to the man-child’s cellphone, cause he can’t afford it himself!

I’ll partner with a guy who earns less if he gets me, is loving to a fault, treats me like a queen (money isn’t always needed to do this), is emotionally supportive, mature in his approach to life, and not allergic to doing things that make it easier for the woman of the house to bring home the bacon/jerk porK. I speak here of helping out around the home ie, cooking a meal every now and again — especially if he gets home earlier than she does — and taking out the trash without being prodded. Trite, maybe, but these things sure make it easier for me when I work 12 hour days!

But back to the point I was trying to make. I don’t mind being with a guy who doesn’t earn as much as I do, although it can be really nice when he does! I’ve always been accepting of the diamond-in-the-rough-kinda guy, to my detriment sometimes. I also would not abandon a partner who fell on hard times, lost his job or got injured — that’s how you demonstrate true love. I’m down for whatever until you get back on your feet and I will support you getting there, step by painful step, plus do my best to make sure we don’t starve or lose the roof over our heads in the meantime!

BUT… I have issues with the ‘Sugar Mama’ phenomenon that seems to be de rigeur among young Jamaican males these days. I’ve had a chance to interact with these 20- and even 30-somethings who hunt for older women to be their surrogate moms/lovers (Oedipal, I know). They don’t mind being the boy toy and providing sex and the ‘appearance ‘ of romance in exchange for financial and other support from their older, more economically established ‘cougars’. As one young man who is studying for his university degree told me recently, “Why not? Women have been doing the reverse for centuries!” On the face of it, the logic may seem unassailable, women have been attaching themselves to men of means forever, so why can’t young men?

To each his/her own. But I cannot see devoting myself  to single-handedly funding the future of a young, albeit ambitious man scrabbling around in search of his footing in the world, when I have struggled so long (and still struggle, alone) to attain this for myself. Will he return the favour and take care of me in my old age (OK, I exaggerate) when he is finally established professionally and economically? Will another women reap the benefits of my investment?

So, for all the young virile males who fall into this category I have a simple message, “You are not my child! I have no obligation to raise you! I am not desperate and I want a man, not a boy!”

But it seems I may have to contend with this new age phenom as I am assailed constantly by young men who start salivating the minute they hear I am an older professional woman, single, childless, but who manages to still be cute, fun and kinda cool at the same time.

Am I swimming against the tide here, is my stance unrealistic? Am I looking for an extinct or at least endangered species? The Daily Mail article suggests that men who are the major breadwinners may soon go the way of the Caribbean Monk Seal, native to Jamaican waters, and believed to have gone extinct in 1952. Possibly over hunted. Hmmm… maybe some parallels here?

So, are  Jamaican women likely to outstrip their male counterparts in the salaries department in the near future by dominating every major career field like the American women in the mentioned article? The latest stats from the University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, show a two per cent increase in male enrollment at the campus for the 2010/2011 academic year compared to 2008/2009.

“It is a statistic — published in UWI’s annual report for 2010-2011 — that the institution hopes will prove prophetic in correcting the years-old imbalance between the number of females and males attending the university. It puts the current male to female distribution on the campus at 30 per cent to 70 per cent, up from some 20 per cent to 80 per cent a few years earlier.”

“The UWI, Mona campus is cognisant of the under-representation of males within the student population. To help counter this imbalance, new programmes were introduced in the sciences, cultural studies and management studies, the hope being in part to attract more male applicants,” reads a section of the report, published in the March 12, 2012 edition of the Sunday Observer.

But what of the female graduates of the past decades, products of a sexually imbalanced campus, where are they finding their mates? And do these likely less educated men earn less than they do? Are Jamaican professional women becoming “the richer sex”? Does it matter?

Barefoot and pregnant, what new age women want?

Image  CAN anybody tell me why the young professional women of today actually WANT to be barefoot and   pregnant – a state of being that women of my generation (40-ish) denied, decried, despised as chauvinist and backward, not too long ago. 

This article was recently published in the Jamaica Observer’s All Woman. Its title was ‘I dont mind being barefoot and pregnant’

“DESPITE the achievements of the women’s movement when it comes to championing the rights of working women, many career women are opting to go back pre-women’s lib, and embrace being barefoot and pregnant — choosing the stay-at-home lifestyle over the whole climbing the career ladder scenario.

Indeed, many women are (or are wishing to) going back to the days when the woman would stay home and care for the family while the man bore the task of being the breadwinner.

“I tell my husband all the time that I don’t mind being barefoot and pregnant,” said Tanya Meichen, 31, who has a master’s degree and a well-paying job as a middle manager in a large communications company.

“The only reason why I haven’t done it is because we can’t afford to live on one salary right now. But after the birth of our daughter, I realised that my destiny didn’t lie in the 8:00 am to 8:00 pm workdays and in trying to compete. To put it bluntly, I’d rather be popping out five more babies; attending school functions and my child’s games, and decorating my home.”

She said she never thought like this before becoming a mother, in fact, “I never wanted children and wanted to be head of my company. But people would never understand the yearning to revert to the traditional, until they have kids.”

Read more:

No disrespect intended, but I thought we were capable of doing it all, mother, wife/partner, professional. At least, that is what my generation was brought up to believe, courtesy of our hardworking, enlightened and educated mothers, and eye-opening books and magazines (there was no cable tv nor social media, nor cellphones for that matter).

Back then we devoured information about the masses of women – primarily in the US and UK – smart, driven, yet sexy and nurturing women, who we held aloft as she-roes while we planned out our future lives, complete with nice (not necessarily rich) hubby, a villa-type home with a nice backyard complete with gazebo, and the 2.5 kids. We went to university, got a career (not just a job), celebrated birth control and our sexuality (and the right to choose any, and as many partners as we wanted).

We endured the ravages of time, a poor economy, sexist male derision and shrieking hordes of barefoot and pregnant woman (usually in rural Jamaican villages) pointing the finger at us and called us “mules”, because we chose to determine when to have babies, and “fool-fool” because we decided not to accept the first marriage proposal we got.

But, just when we seemed to have finally accepted that it was perfectly fine that we couldn’t handle the roles of working woman, wife and mother equally well, all the time – here comes this new generation of educated, professional young women, making it seem like we have been idiots all this time.

The new breed of women don’t want to  work and would readily give it up just to stay home and have babies; leaving it entirely up to the man to provide for the family. If it weren’t for sheer financial necessity, they wouldn’t work outside the home at all.

I get it. You are tired… of trying to do it all, of trying hold it all together, of taking up the slack where the men fail and now you just want to be cared for. Well so am I. I’m bone tired from trying to fend for myself financially for the last 20 + years in a sluggish economy. Doing back-breaking, spirit-crunching, energy-depleting, social life-killing late night, weekend and public holiday shifts. Where is my Sultan of Brunei, Bill Gates, Richard Branford, Michael Lee-Chin to come save me from bills I generated?

I don’t have kids, because I wanted to have them in a committed marriage-type relationship like the one between my parents. They were the foundation of the loving family I grew up in and I haven’t yet found anybody worth trying to recreate this with. Still, even sans kids, I’m tired, I too want a break!! I’m just not willing to give up my financial independence to get it. I could have, I had the offers. Now, mark you, I would have had to be subservient, sweet and available all the time, and depend on the man to give me an allowance and likely tell me how to spend it. The horror! I have witnessed too many relationships on the fritz, where the women can’t leave a ‘wutliss’ man because of her poor finances, or who discover, only when the relationship is dissolved, that the man has spirited off their shared savings.

But, I am honest enough to admit that I’m not a strident feminist. I would accept a suitor’s/lover’s gifts, monetary or otherwise, today. Years back I refused or returned them for fear that he would think me ‘licky-licky’ or easily bought. Maturity has showed me that if a man cares about you, he wants to see you comfortable and happy and will go to the ends of the earth to ensure he makes this happen for you. Like my Daddy did for my Mummy. Like I would for my husband/partner. A real man sees it as a matter of pride/ego that he can care for his woman. What did Steve Harvey say in “Act  Like a Lady, Think Like a Man” – A real man will profess, protect and provide for his woman. That is at the top of my list these days. No more paying half for movies and meals (yes, I actually did all that in the late 80’s). That darn ‘different but equal’ anti-sexism movement had in me a real convert back then.

But I have yet to make the leap to wanting to be barefoot and pregnant, waiting at home for the hubster to bring home the jerk pork. More power to those who see it differently, but I worked too hard on this independence thing to just cast it aside because it is no longer popular, or because it’s just too hard! I battled male coworkers who were less qualified, less smart and got more pay and quicker promotions, although I was busting my ass and they were just drinking with the boys. I endured men being sexist and treating me like a favourite pet or sexy plaything at work, with me having to prove, over and over again, that I had an equally sharp, if not sharper intellect than they did.

So while I get that pregnancy and child-rearing are really hard, and its much simpler to just let the man take care of everything else, can it really be that all these young women are simply content to be called simply ‘mother’, and nothing else? Has the world changed so much?

Copyright (c) 123RF Stock Photos